Some sort of console attached to my arm or floating in front of me to 1. I’m very certain I would continue to play VR WOW in 2D as well. Meanwhile, as a HPally, I played WOW primarily in 2D :)(specifically raid frames). The DBM style warning zones on the ground alone would kill the UX. That said, I very much agree, I wouldn’t want to play WOW in VR. you could jump, in VR it’s very fast to swivel your head, look around the people in front of you or look behind you. > MMO’s are almost exclusively played in 3rd person perspective in part because looking at eye level prevents you from seeing behind the person in front of you The metaverse is a "first class network" built on top of the VR based user interface.
The metaverse isn't a new user interface. WWW is a "first class network" built on the mouse based user interface. Email is a "first class network" built on the text based user interface. Meanwhile, each user interface had its own networks that were built on them. VR now exists as a user interface (although still needs to be improved) and many people love playing Skyrim with it, or Beat Saber.Īll of these were mostly local experiences with different (better?) user interfaces. Touch screens were again a new user interface and with it came games like Fruit Ninja. At a certain point we got the screen and mouse user interface, and with it FPS, RTS, like Warcraft and Doom. Then we had screen and controller based user interfaces, and with it games like Pong.
Historically, we had screen and keyboard based user interfaces, and with it text based gaming like Zork. Metaverse is a network built for that user interface.
I think Zuck wants the general consensus to lean towards: Frankly the problem is, none of these are really well defined.
0 kommentar(er)
